Hi Fred,
On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:08 , Fred Stratton <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been using PIE instead of fq_codel for approximately 10 days. It works > well. Intrigued by your report I went ahead and tested simple.qos with fq_codel and pie (cerowrt 3.10.18-1) with rrul against demo.tohojo.dk: /netperf-wrapper -l 300 -H demo.tohojo.dk rrul -p all_scaled -t my_silly_name Pie (with the default target of 20ms(?) shows around 120 ms ping delay (fq_codel shows 45ms) also the average downlink with fq_codel is roughly 10% higher than with pie. So at least in that test fq_codel seems better than pie. That said, compared to ping latencies up to 300ms (my primary router somehow restricts ;agencies to roughly 300ms) with no AQM, just rate shaping with HTB, pie still keeps the internet more useable. > > Should it? I think its designers wanted it to be a competent disc, so I guess it should :) > > Has PIE been optimized for ADSL? Best Regards Sebastian > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
