Thank you.
Are you still using ADSL2+, Sebastian, or have you moved to fibre?
On 22/11/13 09:10, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:08 , Fred Stratton <[email protected]> wrote:
I have been using PIE instead of fq_codel for approximately 10 days. It works
well.
Intrigued by your report I went ahead and tested simple.qos with
fq_codel and pie (cerowrt 3.10.18-1) with rrul against demo.tohojo.dk:
/netperf-wrapper -l 300 -H demo.tohojo.dk rrul -p all_scaled -t my_silly_name
Pie (with the default target of 20ms(?) shows around 120 ms ping delay
(fq_codel shows 45ms) also the average downlink with fq_codel is roughly 10%
higher than with pie. So at least in that test fq_codel seems better than pie.
That said, compared to ping latencies up to 300ms (my primary router somehow
restricts ;agencies to roughly 300ms) with no AQM, just rate shaping with HTB,
pie still keeps the internet more useable.
Should it?
I think its designers wanted it to be a competent disc, so I guess it
should :)
Has PIE been optimized for ADSL?
Best Regards
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
