>What's more important, Money or the planet?
Let me restate that. Money is nothing but a fungible commodity that
represents productive human endeavor. In short, civilization. So, your
question is really "What's more important, humanity or the planet?". Now,
plenty of well-meaning enviros don't really want to tear down society for
the sake of "mother earth". They'd just like to see a cleaner planet.
That's a nice thing. Craig, I'll bet you are one of those people, aren't
you? But questions like "Money or the planet?" originate from extremists
who really do believe that humanity itself is evil and needs to be eradicated.
>That's the underlying question here, if we can all agree that the planet is
>the most important thing, and I think we do ?? Then the only argument should
>be how we go about reducing pollution quickly and effectively.
How about free markets, private property, and capitalism? It works here in
the U.S. Thanks to private property, we now have far more forest than we
did 65 years ago. Thanks to those forests, the U.S. is actually a net
consumer of CO2(small), while the rest of the world is a net CO2
emitter(gargantuan). With truly free markets, private property and the rule
of law the rest of the world could get their act together even faster.
>If Kyoto is so bad, why doesn't Bush in his infinite wisdom propose
>something better?
Hey, we can't do it all. Being a shining beacon of liberty is a good start
though.
>No, he'd rather spend the $400 billion and his time on Star Wars because
>thats what his pupeteers in the Pentagon want.
Do you really think the Joint Chiefs of Staff sit around kvetching about
how implementing Kyoto will make it harder to fund Star Wars?
Dave Fobare
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
