>Don't give me "the Dems" will only spend the interest rate saving BS. It
>takes two to tango and nothing gets spent in Washington without both parties
>going to the dance.
>
Sure they are both guilty, but the Dems are far more likely to overspend and propose
goofy new programs. Clinton tried to socialize 13% of the economy with his (her)
medical proposal.
>The tax refund was a huge mistake. It will have minimal impact on the
>economy, while causing us to borrow more money and preventing us from
>reducing the debt.
This is the Democrat party spew. Don't believe it. At this point, ANY tax cut is
better than no tax cut. At some point, taxes have to stop increasing. Unless you are
for bigger government and a slow road to socialism, all tax cuts should be supported.
When you cut taxes, spending needs to fall in line. I'm all for cutting taxes first,
and forcing spending cuts. If Congress doesn't comply, they have to borrow to
squander, which further shrinks the pool of money they play with.
This current tax cut is based on an enormous tax surplus, real and projected (they
collected more than they planned to spend). Instead of immediately giving the money
back, the Dems started making spending plans. If you can't cut taxes during a surplus,
then when???? Gore ran with the promise to cut taxes, so it's not some sort of right
wing conspiracy (He would have never done it of course, and spending would have
increased dramatically).
Lee
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
