be handled with other laws. If it's not, then what's the issue? Is it that
it's repugnant to you? Well, what if I say that your religion is repugnant
to me? (Just as an example.) Should I have any more right to say that you
can't practice your religion?
In 7 years, my son will be 14. I wouldn't want him dating a 25 year old
women.
> For example, here is the defination of marriage: The legal union of a man
> and woman as husband and wife. Why is a group of people allowed to change
> that definition?
Um, that's not a universally accepted legal definition. And again, the only
way it gets changed is through a complicated process with a series of checks
and balances.
That's what webster says...
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
