> women.
I was responding to "sex with animals." So, unless you consider your son an
animal (which I'm sure you don't) that's a different argument. I'm in
complete support of protecting children from abusive adults, which I think
is an altogether different subject than sex with animals.
> > For example, here is the defination of marriage: The legal union of a
man
> > and woman as husband and wife. Why is a group of people allowed to
change
> > that definition?
>
> Um, that's not a universally accepted legal definition. And again, the
only
> way it gets changed is through a complicated process with a series of
checks
> and balances.
>
>
> That's what webster says...
Webster's isn't a legal document.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
