prior children.
Point taken.
-----Original Message-----
From: BethF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:52 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Conversation Topic - Abortion
A pregnant woman who doesnt' want a child is NOT a mother, unless she has
prior children.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Stanley
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:31 AM
Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion
Sorry, was playing paintball and then had hockey last night so was in no
shape to type till this morning.
Yup.
Here's the kicker. I understand the arguments the pro-choice people have,
and even at some level agree with most of the issues raised, but I cant
get
around the simple fact that a mother is someone who only wants to protect
and nurture their child, not have them vacuumed out.
>>What, in your opinion, should happen post-viability if the mother wants
an
abortion or wants to do something that poses a risk to the baby?
>>Chemotherapy let's say? Or sky-diving? Enlistment? Driving a car?
If she wants an abortion, she cant have one. If she participates in a
dangerous event and harms the baby then I think she should face the music.
Chemo is different and any harm to the baby is a direct result of medical
treatment and not due to negligence.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
