But bush and Republicans are being blamed.


It's known that "when replublicans are in office" only the rich benefit, but
there are people who don't benefit from whoever is in office.


Clinton didn't do a thing for me, my life was not affected in a positive way
when he was in office.


Also, he gets too much credit for the good economy of  96, 97, 98, which was
a result of the dot com boom...

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:54 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: What if?

5 years in progress, they had no idea who we'd have in office....

...tony

tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337

visit www.antiwrap.com to send long url emails to your friends!

-- dont mistake my perfection as arrogance
anonymous

-----Original Message-----
From: Monique Boea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: What if?

Ok so it took a few month for them to plan 911
I sure it was in progress way before Bush took office.

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: What if?

I think it's unfair to blame the fall of the economy on Bush.

  What you can blame them for is the subsidies being paid to the fat
cats.
the
record national debt, the increases in drug prices that have nearly
negated
any
of the so-called discount programs, The loss of civil rights, and
deliberate
lying to the public.

  911 would have happened regardless of who was in office.

  That is your opinion, and is widely debateable - hopefully on a
different
thread.
  _____
  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to