because they have no business plan. When that was going on the economy
boomed. Not that that made anything right but your argument does not
make sense.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:38:47 -0400
Subject: RE: What if?
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
he just happened to be president at the time.
just like bush happened to be president when 911 happened.
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:31 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: What if?
yeah... a lot of that went on in the dot boom. That was under
Clinton... what was your point again?
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:06:40 -0400
Subject: RE: What if?
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Buy stock in the company...it's great...even tho it has no sound business
model...and it will close in a year"
-----Original Message-----
From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:00 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: What if?
>I think that Wall Street is more to blame that anyone else and people like
>the folks at Enron and Martha Stewart (hate to say it as I admired her as a
>business woman) but people lost faith in corporate American and Wall Street
>after those scandals and in my opinion, this added to the fall of the
>economy more than anything esle.
Wall St is to blame for what specifically?
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
