safer with them there <g> I wonder if this means safer given the
current circumstances, ie now that the invasion has taken place?
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 11:18:46 -0500
Subject: Re: 9/11 Commission to Cheney - You're still wrong.
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 09:46:56 -0600, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or hey, maybe it's a guerilla war where the
> liberatees don't seem all that glad to have us there?
>
> Dana
USAToday opinion survey of 3500 Iraqis from April 2004:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-04-28-gallup-iraq-findings.htm
Opinions seem mixed, and there are some expected apparent
contradictions that will happen in any survey. Interesting numbers.
Some highlights:
3. Taking everything into account, do you think the coalition invasion
of Iraq has done more harm than good or more good than harm?
Total
More harm 46%
More good 33%
The same 16%
14. Do you think now of Coalition forces mostly as occupiers or mostly
as liberators?
Total
Occupiers 71%
Liberators 19%
Both 8%
16. If Coalition left today, would you feel more safe or less safe?
Total
More safe 28%
Less safe 53%
No difference 12%
Don't know 8%
-Kevin________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
