How can you say it is clear that Bin Laden is the man behind this when the
US has completely failed to bring any evidence directly linking him to these
attacks?
Why? Because through the US Media he is the only major terrorist that YOU
know about? Therefore it must be him?
Is he the only multi millionairre funding terrorism in the World?
The answer to that is, of course..no.
You will recall that the US was absolutely certain that Bin Laden was behind
the Oklahoma city bombing as well, and the Media had a field day showing
these same pictures we are seeing now. Was the Media and the maddened crowd
crying for blood correct?
Therefore how can you say who is or is not to blame for this attack with
such authority?
And how is pointing out that there has been no published proof, that not
even US Officials have come out to say that yes it was Bin Laden because x,y
and z, some how tantamount to DEFENDING Bin Laden?
How did that wild leap in logic occur?
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Let me back up from my previous post ... I'll answer this ... I was just
pissed before because this is all so obvious ...
Look, it's pretty clear that Bin Laden is the man behind this. Why would you
defend him? That seems like a terrible betrayal of more than 5,000 people
who died on Tuesday.
H.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
