and I will never accept changing the def. of marriage.
Now, do I believe that a person should be discriminated against because
he/she is gay, of course not.
But, you don't need a "right" to be gay.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:46 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
Wow you of all people then should be a little more open minded since you
have a greater chance of knowing what it feels like to be discriminated
aganist.
Give the gays equal rights and let them have a civil union. Or while we're
passing the 'don't let gays marry amendment' we can repeal the rights of
woman and blacks? I mean if we're going to start pulling equal rights away
why not go full tilt?
I don't think any of those ideas are good :>
William Wheatley
Coldfusion Guru
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
> Just out of curiosity, why not? There are, in my mind, distinct
parallels.
As I said b4, I cannot change how I look. I will be a black female till I
die, unless I pull a Michael Jackson, which I won't :)
I can't hide my race.
A gay man or woman can go into a job interview, and the subject of sexual
preference will not be discussed.
A gay man or woman can go rent an apt and and the subject of sexual
preference will not be discussed.
A gay man or woman can go buy a car, get a home loan, etc. etc. etc. and
the
subject of sexual preference will not be discussed.
I on the other hand where BLACK (proudly that is :)) every day, every
where,
in every situation.
THAT is not the same.
When I fill out most applications for whatver, they ask for my race, they
don't ask my sexual pref.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:48 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
Monique Boea wrote:
> But you guys are missing my point.
> And I am not sure of why you think this is odd when I bring it up.
> But if a group of people can change laws (and PLEASE don't compare this
to
> the black human rights issue) then what is to stop other groups from
Just out of curiosity, why not? There are, in my mind, distinct
parallels.
> changing the laws to further change marriage, age limits, sex limits,
crime,
> etc. Like a man wanting to marry his daughter. Do we further change the
laws
> to accommodate him? Or a woman who wants to sleep with a 14 year old.
>
> Do you guys want a totally lawless society where everyone can do
whatever
> they please?
No. But I do want a relatively lawless society where I can do as I
please so long as I do no harm. However, I'm thinking that you and I
would disagree on the salient points of "doing harm" in this instance.
--BenD
_____
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
