>
> I am. Yes, he got f'ed out of a big prize; but how is
> holding on to the past resolve it? I'm not saying he can't
> be angry about it. But I don't think his brooding is going
> to solve it. He invented the Internet. Maybe he is smart
> enough to invent a time machine to go back to the past and
> fix the problem.
Some things take a long time to get over; not too mention he may come across
as brooding but his ultimate goal is to prevent the same crap from happening
gain; nothing wrong with that.
> >In my opinion, that is a fantastic attribute!
>
> I will reply with an equally sarcastic response. There are
> about 300 million people in the US that are not George Bush.
> Are they all qualified to take office?
Sarcasm was not my intent, reality was. Bush sucks, period. Of course
everyone but Bush is not qualified for office, but surely you understood the
comment.
> >Regardless of party affiliation, a rememberance is never wrong, the
> >events of 9-11 changed the world forever....
>
> I'm divided on the issue myself. I do see it as a potential
> risk though.
Risk? How? Both parties share the responsibility for what happened and for
cleaning up the mess... The only risk I see is someone or some party trying
to use it as a stepping stone. All I saw was a nice rememberance for 3000+
lives lost. I would have said the same thing about it had it been the
Republican convention.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
