But thats how democracies work. Why is it so important where these people live? A majority is a majority, and a candidate in a democratic election better try to appeal to that majority, wherever it lives.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Nick McClure
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:48 AM
  Subject: RE: Electoral College

  Its not so much that the small states will lose their voice, its that
  candidates will not care about, or visit those states.

  If Alaska has 11 people, and California has 1 million, then the candidate
  would focus their energies on policies geared towards more densely populated
  areas.

  If I can create policies that cater to New York, Illinois, California,
  Texas, Michigan, and Florida then I have won the election, while I've left
  out a number of other states.

    _____  

  From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:33 AM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Electoral College

  How? How will sparsely populated states lose their voice????

  If 11 people live in Alaska, then dammit, Alaska should get 11 votes if all
  of it's citizens vote.

  I just dont see how thats such a problem. I see it as a much bigger problem
  if those 11 citizens all of a sudden get 11 electoral votes. 11 is a much
  higher % of 270, than it is of 290 million.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to