Since white guys where the only one with power(women and blacks couldn't
vote), the electoral college had nothing to do with protecting their rights as
a group.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Chris Poterala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:23 PM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Re: Electoral College

  The Electoral College was created to protect land-owning white guys.

  The President is accountable to the "states" in that he was
  accountable to the land-owning white guys back in the late 18th, early
  19th century.  They owned the land, they ran the states.

  I think the idea that states with small populations will "lose out"

  and become marginalized if we went to straight vote is incorrect.

  Anybody from a "small" state who voted for Gore in 2000, but whose
  state electoral votes went to Bush, would instead have had their votes
  mean something, and Gore would be in office right now.

  Chris

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:36:06 -0400
  Subject: RE: Electoral College
  To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  But that is why the Presidency was setup the way it is, to ensure that the
  Leader had equal accountability to the states. The office is not intended to
  be accountable to the people, the office is accountable to the states, and
  to that of congress.

     _____

  From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:48 AM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Re: Electoral College

  But thats how democracies work. Why is it so important where these people
  live? A majority is a majority, and a candidate in a democratic election
  better try to appeal to that majority, wherever it lives.
     ----- Original Message -----
     From: Nick McClure
     To: CF-Community
     Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:48 AM
     Subject: RE: Electoral College

     Its not so much that the small states will lose their voice, its that
     candidates will not care about, or visit those states.

     If Alaska has 11 people, and California has 1 million, then the candidate
     would focus their energies on policies geared towards more densely
  populated
     areas.

     If I can create policies that cater to New York, Illinois, California,
     Texas, Michigan, and Florida then I have won the election, while I've
left
     out a number of other states.________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to