--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   So your position now is that a country cannot even
> seek WMD?  Well when do we
> invade Syria, Iran, China, India, France, Russia,
> Argentina, Colombia and
> Pakistan? Are they not also a threat to the US?

China, India, Pakistan, France and Russia have had
weapons for years and so far proved to be responsible.
Iran is part of the Axis of Evil. I don't know about
Argentina and Colombia.

>   For your information, Korea is not threatening to
> use WMD, they are only
> offering it for sale as international trade, to
> raise money with which to feed
> its starving populace.  

Ok, they're allowing them to be used by someone else.
Same thing.

> You can pretty well bet that
> when N. Korea is considered
> a real threat to the region, China will be the first
> to put them down.  N. Korea
> is not currently a threat to the US.

And we're letting China deal with it.

>   Although you state that anything negative about
> the Bush administration is all
> lies, one must still consider the majority of polls
> that show that the American
> people are of the impression that the reason that
> the US invaded Iraq was due to
> their stockpiles of WMD.  How did they get that
> impression if not specifically
> stated that way or strongly implied by the current
> President and his
> administration?

Every country thought they had WMD's even Saddam
himself thought he had them. Kerry said he'd have
still approved the war even knowing they didn't have
them.

>   The reason the administration is trying its best
> to distance themselves from
> the Swift boat stuff, is because they do not
> consider it as being true. This is
> from their own statements.  It doesn't matter one
> whit whether you believe it or
> not.

No they claim the swift boat folks are acting on their
own. I didn't read anything about the administration
calling them liars.


>   It doesn't matter that you say the Iraq
> connections to Al Q are lies, the Bush
> and Cheny campaign speeches as late as this week
> still claim there is a
> connection.
>


They say now that there are ties and we have plenty of
evidence to prove it. They never made the claim last
year.

>   I want to hope and believe that the majority of
> the American voters do not
> wish the US to be the international bully they are
> currently perceived as, and
> will vote their conscience accordingly this
> November.

We're not bullies. The UN approved severe consequences
if Iraq did not comply. They changed their mind in the
end and we didn't.

-sm

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to