> I never said none, I said "I am talking about the
> invasion of Iraq by Shrub,
> and most countries did not act. " which is proven by
> my figuires above. Nice
> try.
Sorry, I mixed it up with another message saying there
were no countries.
> I also never said we should follow the UN in every
> matter. But when the free
> nations of the world build a coalition, then we're
> part of that. When they
> dont, then it's not our job to do it unilaterally
> unless one of my two
> conditions is met:
> 1. We are attacked
> 2. We need more real estate.
Not unilaterally, there were over 30 countries.
> >> You prefer to live in caos?
>
> I dont consider the world we live in today any more
> chaotic than in times
> past, in fact I would say it's less so because of
> the speed of
> communication. And either way, I would prefer that
> to being so high and
> mighty that we are actually telling other countries
> what they can and cannot
> have. To me, that is the same as an act of war (in
> other words, if I was a
> smaller country and the US said "you cant have these
> weapons", I would feel
> it infringed on my liberty and take it very very
> personally.)
If a country is a known threat and seek WMD's they
will need to be stopped. Many nations now have nuclear
weapons; the one we're most worried about is Korea
because they threaten to use it. Prove you are not a
threat and we'll let you be.
-sm
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
