Lee, Richard Feynman, considered by many to be the only person who understood quantum mechanics, once said that anybody who claims to understand quantum mechanics doesn't.
And so it is true with economics. Implicit in your email is the fact that you do understand economics and so by voicing your opinion you've removed all doubt as to your competence with it. As for Greenspan's competence I've not yet seen the soft landing he had promised. He also seems to have had a VERY itchy throttle finger; but then I don't claim to understand economics. Lee wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:33 PM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >Since when does an economist's opinion mean that the democrats are lying? > >Rather than logically presenting the case, you ask the reader for a leap > of > >faith Greenspan blabs something, so you say the democrats are lying? How > >does one get from one conclusion (greenspan testifying before congress) > to > >the other (the democrats are lying). It just doesn't follow. Where's the > >evidence? > > > Maybe lying is a little harsh. Let's just say the democrats have been a > little disingenuous when debating the tax cut issue. Unless of course they > don't agree with Greenspans contention that tax cuts provide much needed > economic stimulus. > > Lee > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
