And the republican party has not been? I still cannot see the merits of plunging the country into massive debt based on an ideological point. We almost elmininated the crushing debtload that Ronnie Raygun and Bush Senior saddled us with, when the junior bush decides to wipe out any gains. That is not the most swisft of moves, especially now that there is a self declared war that makes such discussion moot. To pay for this thing where is the money coming from? Either the government will be be forced to raise the recently lowered taxes or put us in a spiral of deficit spending that we have not seen since the 1980's.
larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:53 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Greenspan: Tax cut needs to be big > > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:33 PM, Larry Lyons > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >Since when does an economist's opinion mean that the > democrats are lying? > >Rather than logically presenting the case, you ask the > reader for a leap > of > >faith Greenspan blabs something, so you say the democrats > are lying? How > >does one get from one conclusion (greenspan testifying > before congress) > to > >the other (the democrats are lying). It just doesn't follow. > Where's the > >evidence? > > > Maybe lying is a little harsh. Let's just say the democrats > have been a > little disingenuous when debating the tax cut issue. Unless > of course they > don't agree with Greenspans contention that tax cuts provide > much needed > economic stimulus. > > Lee > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
