the <cffunction> type format instead of <cfscript> format.
larry
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:44:45 -0500, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CFLib has many MX only UDFs. You can filter them in the advanced
> search. Let me know if you have any other questions!
>
> -ray
>
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:54:15 -0500, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since CFLib came out around CF5's time, has there been an update for CFMX?
> > Specifically, do the libraries exist in CFFunction format? I know you can
> > convert them over, it would just be handy to have it in this format to begin
> > with. I know, I know, I'm lazy damnit!
> >
> > Marlon
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
