I agree. I prefer to write UDFs using cffunction since it adds all
kinds of validation options out of the box.

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:34:24 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, that's what I meant.  I've been putting my UDF's into
> > CFC's so that I
> > can access them from both cfm pages and cfc's.  At the top
> > of my CFC I'll
> > put a statement like "variables.function_library =
> > createobject("component",
> > "path.to.function.library").  I'm also using CFEclipse and
> > I love their CFC
> > method explorer/outline viewer.  If I just paste the
> > cfscript code into the
> > CFC, it works, but the outline viewer doesn't catch it.
>
> > Now that I've typed this out, I'm starting to think I
> > sound pathetic :)
>
> Not sure why that should sound pathetic... introspection can be really
> helpful. :)
>
> s. isaac dealey     954.927.5117
> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
>
> add features without fixtures with
> the onTap open source framework
>
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
> http://www.fusiontap.com
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to