In general we prefer the cfscript format since it will work in both
cf5 and cfmx. I have not been 100% anal about that - but I assume most
folks can rewrite to cfscript if necessary.

-r

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:49:40 -0400, Larry C. Lyons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think what Marlon meant was whether any of the CFLib UDF's are in
> the <cffunction> type format instead of <cfscript> format.
>
> larry
>
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:44:45 -0500, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > CFLib has many MX only UDFs. You can filter them in the advanced
> > search. Let me know if you have any other questions!
> >
> > -ray
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:54:15 -0500, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since CFLib came out around CF5's time, has there been an update for CFMX?
> > > Specifically, do the libraries exist in CFFunction format?  I know you can
> > > convert them over, it would just be handy to have it in this format to begin
> > > with.  I know, I know, I'm lazy damnit!
> > >
> > > Marlon
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to