fair enough. Just checking due to the previous discovery that Sam
doesn't believe any of my sources and I don't believe his :) But I'll
sign up for this. This is, however what Gruss says he has. Should he
have footnoted?

Dana


----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:15:06 -0400
Subject: RE: It's for the oil
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Multiple, non-related news sources compiled together with other information.
I KNOW that just about every news agency has their own biases and agendas.
They also feed off of each others news feeds like incestuous piranha. Trust
one source and your screwed for sure. Trust none and you may get a true
picture. :)

  _____  

erm, whom do we believe?

Dana

----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:15:25 -0400
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

And we believe the BBC why exactly?

>No, seriously, all of the content is my original writing - the ideas,
>however, are a summary of lots of sources I can send you if you'd
>like.  and I did quote the BBC News are a
source!________________________________
  _____________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to