now I was talking about the situation then, pre-Iraq invasion.
As for now...Kerry has been known to admit to being wrong and to take
the consequences. Not to be partisan or anything.
Dana
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:09:46 -0400, Jochem van Dieten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dana tierney wrote:
> >
> > As for European volunteers, why not? As I understand the situation
> > they objected to being expected to follow on faith. A reasoned
> > rationale might well have met with better success.
>
> With 20-20 hindsight: how can a reasoned rationale convince those countries
> that WMD exist, when in fact they don't? I don't see France or Russia go to
> war for anything but that and I don't see Germany go to war at all. Unless
> perhaps Bin Laden is holding pep rallies in the streets of Baghdad.
>
> > At this point
> > however they may well feel that we broke it, we bought it, and perhaps
> > rightly so.
>
> I think most do. But considering the alternatives that does not mean it is
> in their best interest not to help in the current situation.
>
> However, doing so would mean 'rewarding' the US for ignoring their
> objections. So unless there is a US president brave enough to stand up and
> say "We were wrong, you were right. There were no WMD. Iraq is a mess. We
> can't do this alone, we will stay but transfer power to the UN. Please help
> us." it is going to take quite some time before there will be any help.
>
> Jochem________________________________
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
