say dying, you are referring to the massacres of Kurds? Or to some
other set of circumstances? Because while I do not want to diminish
the importance of any death, Lord knows, I am not aware of any
massacres within ten years of our invasion, so why then?
Dana
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:05:53 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ken Ketsdever wrote:
> > What about all the innocent men, women and children?
>
> I'm not sure that's a fair criticism. While it's true innocent people
> have died, and are dying, they were already dying due to the existing
> leadership and its henchmen.
>
> Nobody can guarantee that in 10 years the number of innocent dead will
> be less than if the US hadn't invaded. In theory, however, the world
> is always better off when you remove a dictator.
>
> But this is dangerous game ...
>
> Many people think Iraq was a bulwark for Iran - Iran's recent nuclear
> challenges add credibility to that assertion. Should Iran take the
> opportunity of a weakened America to pursue WMD and/or destabilize
> Iraq, the invasion could indeed cause more innocent death than
> otherwise.
>
> Between now and then, though, the Iraqis have options; something they
> didn't have under Mr. Hussein.________________________________
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
