I heard the same exact claims from Kerry in all three
debates. Difference is this time Bush corrected him
and pointed out his numbers were all wrong.

-sm

--- G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I dunno if the Bushies will disagree or not, but i
> agree with ya.
>
> Kerry actually really surprised me in the debates.
> He looked more prepared than W, he was calmer, more
> professional. I dont think he necessarily beat W on
> the issues or anything (those were pretty much a
> draw imo), but i think he just looked better.  
>
> You know...no hunchbacks or anything like that :)
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Gruss Gott
>   To: CF-Community
>   Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 8:24 AM
>   Subject: Re: From the right
>
>
>   > Brian wrote:
>   > They have the right to speak of their feelings
> too.
>
>   Well said.
>
>   I agree that Mr. Kerry's advisors made a huge
> mistake playing up his
>   Vietnam service so much during the convention to
> point of the
>   "reporting for duty" thing.  The product they are
> selling is Mr. Kerry
>   today, not Mr. Kerry in Vietnam (although it does
> tell us something
>   about him, volunteering for combat when he
> could've easily avoided
>   it.)
>
>   I know Bush-supporters will disagree, but I think
> Mr. Kerry showed a
>   consistant thoughtfulness throughout all 3 debates
> and that's the
>   product the Democrats should've been selling the
> whole time.
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to