I think only the far right nuts have called Kerry un-American, and i completely disagree with anyone who says he is. I'd also never argue against his right to free speech, especially as a veteran of the war, he has every right to comment on it on his return home.

That being said, he absolutely HAS to know, that by speaking out, he's taking a huge risk....namely the kind of backlash that he's seeing today.

So i'm simply saying that freedom of speech is not freedom from consequence, and you shouldn't be surprised that some people were, and still are, genuinely upset by his comments. They have the right to speak of their feelings too.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Gruss Gott
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 4:30 PM
  Subject: Re: From the right

  > Dana wrote:
  > Personally I find it offensive that the man's exercise of his free
  >  speech perogatives is being portrayed as unamerican.

  I agree with Dana and think there are 4 points worth bringing up:

  1.) Questioning medals the Navy sanctions as legitimate puts into
  question all Navy medals.  What message does this send to veterans?
  How do I know all Navy medals aren't forged, faked, or fraud?

  2.) Mr. Kerry spoke out to end a war that just about every American
  agrees was foolish and unwinnable.  Mr. Kerry got what he asked for,
  the end to the Vietnam war.  Is the argument that we should restart
  it?  If not, then how is he "anti-American"

  3.) While there are many swift boat vets willing to denigrate Mr.
  Kerry's service, all of the troops that served directly under Mr.
  Kerry are supporting him.  (ok I think 1 wasn't, by the vast majority
  are.)  The best measure of military officer is the opinion of those
  that served under him.

  4.) Mr. Kerry served in combat - whether you think he was a coward or
  not, he still was there getting shot at.  Mr Bush was not.  This is
  important because there is a legitimate question whether Mr. Bush
  should've sent US troops into combat.  Someone who's been in combat is
  likely to be more cautious than someone who wasn't.  Based on the data
  it looks like Mr. Bush should've been more cautious and continues to
  mismanage US forces.  (Senators from his own party have called his
  handling of Iraq "incompetent")
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to