Then he says we have to prove to the world why we're
doing it.
Sounds like a flip-flop.
Does this mean if he can't prove to the world why he's
doing it he will cede the right?
Sounds clear enough until asked to define proof of
"legitimate reasons." We all know what's considered a
legitimate reason varies from country to country. Look
at the UN.
-sm
--- G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im not sure he's flip-flopping.......getting world
> approval for US policy has always been his stance.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Morris
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 1:52 PM
> Subject: Re: POLL:
>
>
> I especially like the "prove to the world" part.
>
> Sounds like he's flip-flopping again, don't you
> think?
>
> -sm
>
> <snip>
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
