> Michael wrote: > So your defining support as troops on the ground? The definition of "international support" is something like this:
The majority of the populations of US allies believe a US military expedition is morally and legally justified and are therefore willing to commit military, monetary or moral support. Anybody that's being honest about Iraq knows that the US is 90% of the troop strength and money and that the populations of the rest of the 10% are against their goverment's involvement. The theory here is that if you can't sell the majority of the world on your war then it's probably military adventurism, which is exactly what Iraq has proven to be for the US: No WMD and no state sponsored terrorist connection. Therefore no threat. The world was right, the US was wrong. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=37 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:132206 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
