Here we go again. Saddam shot at our planes every day. You say that's not a threat? Saddam kept kicking out the inspectors. What was he hiding? You don't think that represents a threat? Saddam was trying to purchase yellowcake from Niger. You don't think that constitutes a threat? You seem to think that just because there's no WMD stockpiles we should say were sorry. Why was the UN there and why were there sanctions against Iraq if they were so harmless? You should cry to the UN for torturing Saddam for 13 years.
--- Angel Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Blah blah blah...yadda yadda...blah blah.... > > Right. Yet another article that has little to > nothing to do with the reasons that the Bush > Administration put forward for going into > the war. > You see, you need to separate the current Rhetoric, > from what was said -and this part is important- > LEADING UP TO the war. > > See, my problem is that the Bush Administration said > certain things to the American people and the > International community LEADING > UP TO the war. These were put forward as the REASONS > FOR GOING TO WAR. > > These REASONS FOR GOING TO WAR that were put forward > were: > > 1) Saddam Hussein and his regime in Iraq represented > the greatest threat to American Security, the > greatest Terrorist Threat AT THAT > TIME. > 2) Saddam Hussein had STOCKPILES of Weapons of Mass > Destruction at his disposal to sell to terrorists, > or to use himself against > either the US or his neighbours. > 3) Saddam Hussein had an ACTIVE BIOCHEMICAL WARFARE > PROGRAM and was IN THE PROCESS of producing > bio-chemical warfare agents. > > Your little copy and paste neatly sidesteps these > points. > > The above points were false. Therefore we now know > that AS PUT FORTH TO THE PEOPLE AND THE WORLD BY THE > BUSH ADMINISTRATION, THERE > WAS NO REASON TO GO TO WAR AT THAT TIME, IN THAT > WAY.The PreEmptive strike which Bush launched was > based on those three 'Facts' > which we now know are not true. > > Now, if you would like to somehow deal with the > above statement fine. > But please don't post some poppy cock that has > nothing to do with it in response. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:134930 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
