Interesting, if I read that right, he voted against the bill because it didn't include his tax increase for 400k+ plus individuals.
Or am I missing something else? -----Original Message----- From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 2:16 PM To: CF-Community Subject: nick - that body armor vote While I am procrastinating here, I found this. If this site is correct (and I think it is usually considered careful) then neither you nor I is exactly right. I'll look into it a little more later. http://www.factcheck.org/article155.html -- Diebold: It's a better way to deliver a state ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:134986 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
