You are right, the armor was a small portion when talking about money, but when Kerry used that in a speech, pointing directly to body armor as a problem with this administration, and then turns around and votes no for the very Bill that would have provided it.
The armor may have been inexpensive in comparison, but it sure does go a long way to protect priceless lives. -----Original Message----- From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 3:11 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: nick - that body armor vote Oh. Brain bubble. I suppose that if you make more than 400k a year that is what it is. This version fits what Kerry was saying in his campaign speeches. When I said that wasn't exactly right, I was referring to the very small portion of the bill that had to do with armor and to the fact that armor apparently was not adequately addressed by anyone/ Dana On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:04:15 -0500, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From the article: > "Kerry was referring to a measure he co-sponsored that would have provided > the $87 billion while also temporarily reversing Bush's tax cuts for those > making $400,000 a year or more. That measure was rejected 57-42." > > I would call that Kerry's tax increase. > > -----Original Message----- > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 2:55 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: nick - that body armor vote > > *Kerry's* tax increase? That's not what I got out of it. > ? > Dana > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135046 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
