If widespread electoral fraud occurred affecting the outcome of the 2004 election, it should be investigated by the proper authorities.
It is your argument that evidence exists that suggests this is the case? I've seen quite the opposite. Keeping in mind that honest accidents, slip ups, snafus, minor glitches, etc....do NOT comprise intentional fraud, and tend to wash out in the end. > I don't subscribe to that train of thought. Whether or not online petitions > are worthless are a separate issue. > > Today's Washington Post had an interesting column on the subject today in > the Metro section. (Especially given that yesterday's post had an article > calling all the people who were voicing problems with the system conspiracy > theorists). > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135710 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
