> From: Jason Lemahieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> I don't think it should come with better headphones.  Most 
> people have better headphones already - so why force every 
> customer to pay more for something when they're not going to 
> use it?  

It would cost Apple very little to include headphones for more than the
everyday listener.

> As for a protective case, I also am glad it didn't 
> cost me more money and include a mandatory case

No one is going to force you to use a case.... But a $200 MP3 player
with a nice screen should come with a case of some sort.

> Also, this way, people can get whatever type 
> of case they want.  

On top of the $200 for the ipod mini... Seems a little silly to me.

> Are you going to use it for running?  Get 
> an armband case.  Are you going to be the guy who clips the 
> ipod on your belt?  Get one that supports that.  Do you need 
> your ipod case to match your bright pink hair?  Okay enough of that.

All I am saying is that Apple should have included a little more for the
money, that is all.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:137114
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to