> Larry wrote: > Many of the people that are mentioned in the article have absolutely > no credibility. They are ideologs pure and simple.
This is the danger with people of this sort. Once you agree to start letting "morals" into science and law, you head down a very slippery slope. This is because you now have to assign an arbiter of morals; someone who has the final word. That person is usually corrupt or becomes corrupt (Jerry Falwell, Jim Baker, et. al.). That's the problem I have with gay marriage: opponents don't see it as a human rights issue, they see it as gays trying to force their lifestyle on them. As such they feel it's something that can be voted on. I don't - it's basic human rights. There is only one principle that should be held high, the Golden Rule. Everything else should be a matter of community, not national politics. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:137400 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
