On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:26:26 -0700, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Xeon does outperform > comparable AMDs on common office applications. If you *aren't* doing > graphics-intensive work why go the extra mile to get an AMD? 1. What extra mile? 2. Xeon on the desktop just to run Office? 3. AMD is cheaper. I use both, but I buy them based on cost/benefit at the time of purchase as well as factors other than raw speed, like power and thermal characteristics, integrated heat spreader, battery consumption in laptops, corporate designated vendor, etc. -Kevin ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:137790 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
