In this case the companies pay the screeners minimum wage. Moreover employee turnover is 125%. Doesn't that suggest that the companies are falling down on the job. After their performance over the last year how can the feds do a worse job on something that is very close to law enforcement in the first place.
larry -- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com http://www.pacel.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Lon Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:50 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: just when you think you've heard it all ... > > > I'm not a fan of nationalization, of anything. However, I wouldn't > have a problem with the feds setting training and operation > standards. > If you want to mandate an FAA approved training course, that would be > okay. And then set federal guidelines on how they operate. > And then fine > the crud out of them when they fail to do their jobs. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:36 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: just when you think you've heard it all ... > > > And of course the house of representatives voted yesterday to a new > airport > security bill that still have these companies that currently > do airport > security continue their incompetence. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
