> But was it generally 'understood' that it was all from God? You're assuming that understanding in this case just 'is'. It isn't. You have to start somewhere.
The point I am trying to make is that it was not "understood" in our science class that everything comes from God, we were studying science, religion study was for the religion classes. There wasn't an implied blanket policy of "all things come from God" we were being taught to think critically about facts and theories and we weren't taught to throw in a God angle simply because it was an easy out, e.g., I don't understand what to do next or why this behaves the way it does, throw in a "Mind of God" and our problem can be left for future generations to figure out. So I am lead to another question. At what point should science give up trying to explain the unexplainable and adopt a "God created everything 'understanding'"? Is there a limit? Should there be? If so, why? If not, why not? I should think that if God did indeed create everything, and is lurking out there behind Intelligent Design, then perhaps there is a curtain to be pulled up, to be looked behind. Would it be too much to think then that God might want to cap our knowledge and understanding at some point be before we get to the rivets and I-beams of this ol Universe of ours? -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:140105 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
