That seems ridiculously sensible to me. This missile defense shield is a gigantic waste of time, money, and resources.
I much prefer our current 'missile defense system'. It goes like this: "Shoot a missile at us, and we'll unload our entire stockpile on you....and I bet we've got more missiles than you do" > <quote> > Martin was emphatic Canada's participation in the missile defence > program would depend on a key decision-making role in the U.S. command > and control structure that operates the shield. > > "The decision as to whether or not we participate in the ballistic > missile defence system is going to depend on whether, in fact, Canada > can have a voice in the structure," Martin said in the interview, to > be broadcast Christmas Day. > > "I'm not going to put money into it. I'm going to put money into our > priorities ... Having missiles on our territory is not one of those > priorities." > </quote> > > Dana > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:51:20 -0500, Harkins, Patrick > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes, that is Martin's position. He says he is reserving judgement at this >> time, and that is his approach to government generally. Not a popular >> one, but maybe not a stupid one! >> Patrick >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Dana >> >> If they are going >> >to pay, they want some say. Makes sense to me.... >> > >> >Dana >> >> Outbound email scanned for viruses. (e230) >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:140355 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
