> Brian wrote: > Well, to clarify, the two jurors who agreed to talk with the media indicated > that his lack of emotion may have played a part in their decision during the > PENALTY phase of the trial.
To me the death penalty should only be applied when there is overwhelming physical evidence that the accused committed the crime. In this case there is nothing except circumstantial evidence. I don't see how you can convict a guy to death with only circumstantial evidence. I would admit it doesn't look good but if we're open minded about it he could've just been in the wrong place at the wrong time. I watched the Abraham's Report all through the trial and that seems like it was as good as being there as they had actual jurors, lawyers, and correspondents that were at the trial every day as well as the tapes. In my opinion the evidence doesn't warrant the death penalty and it's not even a close call. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139821 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
