I'd say no, for the same reason: there are simply more people in a city, and thus a better chance of "sick" crimes. In fact, I'd argue that these rural sick crimes stick out so much primarily because of their rarity.
We're probly arguing relative semantics here anyway though. Bottom line is there are sick, sick people all over this planet. > > Anyway, I wonder what the per capita crime rates are between the two. > That being said I wonder where the sicker crimes happen? Sure, in the > city you may be more likely to have your wallet or car stolen, but > what about sick stuff? Maybe you're more likely to have that happen > to you in the country. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:140749 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
