No offense, but I think you're missing the mark entirely. Your audience is very tech-savvy but you're using 90's layout techniques, namely tables. I personally I find the new design clumsy and ugly, but I know you've never claimed to be a designer. Aesthetics aside though, if you're going through the effort of a redesign then people are going to wonder why you're using bad techniques, tables, instead of CSS.
CSS layouts are here. Spend some time with an Eric Meyer book or two and you'll be itching to do them too. http://tinyurl.com/6t62m -Kevin On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:01:34 -0400, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I think this is close to the finished product. > http://fusionauthority.com/test2.htm > > Smaller banner area and larger content area, 1 option for a graphic banner, > cleaner code, less images and an all around tighter layout. I've gotten both > good and bad reviews of the new header with white above and below the site > name. I think it works well, but have a single worry; the logo might be to > large. > Again, what do you think. On list, off list by ICQ/AOL (2995061), let me hear > as I'd like to include the new design with the new site code coming next week. > Thanks > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:141227 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
