On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 05:34:10 -0800, Ken Ketsdever
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Do you really think that if Iraq could get that info China couldn't? What 
> about Pakistan, India, > Israel (unproven), South africa (unproven)

I'm talking about missile guidance systems. None of the other
countries you mentioned have the technology, except maybe Israel, but
since China has it we don't know whom they'll share it with. Before
Clinton, China couldn't even get a missile to go straight up. Now they
can hit NY with a nuclear warhead with ease. Not that they will, but
they're close with North Korea, piss them off and who knows.

> Excuse me, but not only has Bush not found any WMD in Iraq there is NO viable 
> link to the Al Qaeda.  We were justified to go into Afghanistan and clear out 
> the al Qaeda.  But Bush has never produced any evidence of a link between 
> Sadam and the Al Qaeda.  So to try and justify this war as a war on terrorism 
> is just ridiculous.
> 

You seem to think the war on terror means al Qaeda. It doesn't. It's a
war against extremists that want to destroy us. Al Qaeda is the
highest profile terrorist organization right now but there are many
more.

-sm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:142971
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to