> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I most certainly do not think of homesexuality as inferior. > My point is that we are talking about a cartoon, for > children, devised to educate the children on what they are > seeing in the cartoon. If you broach a subject in the > cartoon, you need to discuss it, to educate on it. If the > purpose of the cartoon is to educate about sexual > differences, then absolutely make reference to character > sexuality. But if there is no intent in the cartoon to > discuss sexuality, why include references to the sexual > preferences of ANY of the characters, straight or otherwise?
> But we're not talking about a show. On a show, yeah, do > whatever you want with characters and their sexuality. But on > a cartoon, devised to educate children??? Either educate them > on the subject of sexuality, or don't. You response still makes it sound like the only time it is ok to incoporate homosexuality is when it needs to be discussed. Why can it not just "be"? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:144855 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
