Well, the biological issue outside of a committed relationship then affects family structure.
We would have to question if it is beneficial for a child to have a mother and father. I also know there are fine single parents out there. Some of which would be content to stay single, while others continue to look for a significant other. But the main question to be asked would be "What is more beneficial to the child?". In my opinion. Yves On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:18:02 -0400, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yves Arsenault wrote: > > > > Because they are very different biologically. If we are strickly > > saying marriage is just a choice people make to be together, then > > there is no difference. But there is the sexual biological issue in > > marriage if sex is a big part of marriage. > > Does that sexual biological issue only exists in sex between married > partners, or does that issue exist outside the marriage too? > > If you believe the possibility of procreation when having sex is a relevant > distinction, distinguish by that distinction. Not by some other one which may > largely coincide with it. > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148230 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
