On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:29:26 -0700, Dana wrote: > But what I see in Sam's example is that anything that can be construed > as critical of Bush is purported to be proof of bias.
Most major media supports the democrats and bash Republicans. That's the way it is. Now that the election is over and they've eased up on the Republican bashing yet you think they're supporting Bush. They're not. As for Fox being an agent for the government, they're the ones that reported the Bush DUI two days before the 2000 election almost costing him the election. You want so badly to believe I only see in black and white. I don't agree with everything the President does, I just argue when he's attacked unfairly. > Excuse me, but are we not rolling back environmental regulation? I thought we were just delaying them so not to put all the small family run factories out of business. I Haven't givin this much thought so I could easily turn against Bush on this if you can make a good case. > Are we not dismantling welfare programs? Didn't we start that in the '90's? I think we should anyway. Dem's: Keep the man down and he'll always need you. Rep's: Train the man to fend for himself and he won't need you. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:150283 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
