Well, that's what the Court is for. And if Congress doesn't like what the court has done, they can always amend the Constitution
H. -----Original Message----- From: Lon Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:37 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Bush Wins! I do hate to say it, but we do need something official to throw out laws which violate the Constitution. Congress sure has a hard time passing laws that don't violate our rights. And in a way, it falls under the checks and balances duty of the Judicial branch. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:00 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Bush Wins! Lon: Good response. Can't find fault with anything you said. Have to agree, even where you show I was wrong. Well, I still say it's the job of the court (without being activist) to interpret the Constitution. Otherwise, I agree. H. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
