> Dana wrote: > Just for fun, then I got to get to work -- here is another link. This > one says you would not use a CAT scan to assess the amount of brain > damage, you would use an MRI which, correct me if I am wrong, this > woman has not had. >
The problem with all of this CAT/MRI/Whatever data is that it will never prove anything since neurobiology is an inexact science. That is, you'll always be able to find someone somewhere who thinks tomorrow she'll wake up normal. Therefore *her husband* has to make a preponderance of evidence decision: is there enough data to say that she can recover? If *his* feeling is no, and he thinks (she wouldn't of even had to mention it) she wouldn't of wanted to live that way, he can and should decide to put her to rest. That's what's happened in this case and court after court has said and is saying so. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151309 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
