only one court acting as the finder of fact. Multiple courts saying that Florida law does not require that court to do more.
But let me get this straight - you guys are no longer the scientists vs those of us who believe in witch doctors? I thought it was we benighted folk who were disregarding science? Dana On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:17:43 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana wrote: > > Just for fun, then I got to get to work -- here is another link. This > > one says you would not use a CAT scan to assess the amount of brain > > damage, you would use an MRI which, correct me if I am wrong, this > > woman has not had. > > > > The problem with all of this CAT/MRI/Whatever data is that it will > never prove anything since neurobiology is an inexact science. That > is, you'll always be able to find someone somewhere who thinks > tomorrow she'll wake up normal. > > Therefore *her husband* has to make a preponderance of evidence > decision: is there enough data to say that she can recover? > > If *his* feeling is no, and he thinks (she wouldn't of even had to > mention it) she wouldn't of wanted to live that way, he can and should > decide to put her to rest. > > That's what's happened in this case and court after court has said and > is saying so. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151310 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
