I agree with the dissenting opinion. By the way, the link Larry posted to the decision does work; I guess it's just busy.
Dana On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:30:02 -0400, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dana wrote: > > > > What I am thinking is that whether you agree with the law or not, it > > is clear the courts are interpreting it to suit thier own view of what > > should happen. > > Could you quote the relevant part of the law and offer your interpretation? > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151399 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
